It rolls around each year:  back to school, Labor Day, football season and the September 30th deadline for government reporting.  While next year may bring changes given the proposed  EEO-1 pay report, the filing obligations remained unchanged for this year.

Extensions

Of note, we suspect the deadlines may not be automatically extended this year as they have been in years past, so employers should not count on this.  Why?  Unlike in years past, the EEO-1 reporting system has been updated and the Joint Reporting Committee (JRC) is promptly responding to requests for IDs and passwords.  However, employers may request and receive a “one-time” 30-day extension here.  The JRC states, “No extensions will be granted after Oct. 30th.”

Strategic Considerations

As your organization files reports this year and in the future, be strategic and consider the following:

For All Employers

Implications for Pay Reporting in Q1 2018.  Beginning in Q1 2018, employers will likely have to file W-2 earnings from calendar year 2017 and hours worked on every EEO-1 Report.  This pay data will be used by the enforcement agencies to determine which organizations to investigate as well as made public by the agency.

Ensure you are prepared by doing the following:

  • Conduct a pay equity analysis to identify and address pay issues now.

 

  • At the beginning of the year, conduct “test runs” of your 2016 W-2 and hours worked data to determine if your organization is prepared to pull and merge the data required from your HRIS and payroll systems to complete these reports.  This will help inform if new reports need to be queries and the manpower required to complete these new obligations.

 

  • Breaking up Separate Legal Entities and Location.  Employers should accurately break up their reports by separate legal entity and location.  There are specific rules on how to handle locations of less than 50 employees, which notably differ between the two sets of reports.  Ensure they are handled properly – they should not be automatically rolled to the closest location, etc.  We often see issues with employees in these smaller locations placed into incorrect reports.

 

For Federal Contractors and Subcontractors

 

  • Consistency with AAP Structure.  In OFCCP audits, federal contractors and subcontractors must submit these reports, which should be set up relatively consistently (with a few exceptions) to the AAP.  OFCCP will compare to the AAP numbers by EEO-1 category and use for evaluative purposes to determine compliance.  This is also important as the EEO-1 reports are used to select employers for audits and locations of less than 50 are generally not selected for audit.

 

  • Using the VETS-4212 to Evaluate Compliance with the Vets Hiring Benchmark.  The hiring section of the VETS-4212 report reflects progress toward the current 6.9% veteran hiring benchmark and the effectiveness of your outreach efforts.  OFCCP evaluates this in audits.

 

Happy reporting and, as always, let us know if we can help.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Laura A. Mitchell Laura A. Mitchell

Laura Mitchell is a principal in the Denver office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and leads the firm’s Workplace Analytics and Preventive Strategies Pay Equity subgroup. She partners with employers to evaluate, develop and implement policies and practices that ensure workplace fairness while mitigating…

Laura Mitchell is a principal in the Denver office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and leads the firm’s Workplace Analytics and Preventive Strategies Pay Equity subgroup. She partners with employers to evaluate, develop and implement policies and practices that ensure workplace fairness while mitigating legal risk. Laura is a guiding force in the firm’s most specialized and technical practice areas where she leverages an analytics-focused approach to partner with her clients in building legally compliant programs around which they can anchor their workplaces achieving productivity and stability.

Laura understands that creating a competitive advantage for employers in today’s workplace involves using a data-driven approach to counsel companies on the development of proactive and equitable non-discriminatory practices in hiring, promotions, separations and pay—and where advancements in technology can create both opportunities for efficiencies and risk that can be measured. Committed to putting her clients’ organizational goals first and foremost while balancing legal risk, Laura views herself as an extension of her clients’ team, responsible for providing proactive guidance and engaging in transparent, ongoing communication. Staying the course with employers across their organizational journey while balancing legal compliance obligations throughout their employees’ lifecycle ensures Laura’s position as a go-to resource.

Laura works with companies across all industries—both new and well-established multi-national organizations of all sizes—to realize the combined vision of legal compliance, increased productivity and economic growth enhanced by a focus on pay equity.  As part of the pay equity journey, she advises employers on the evolving pay transparency landscape, working to align compliant practices with the practical realities of the business world.

Laura partners closely with government contractors to understand, implement and demonstrate compliance with their EEO regulatory and compliance obligations. She also works closely with non-government contractor clients to conduct risk assessments of their programs, policies, and training to align with federal and state anti-discrimination requirements.

Laura is the editor and a principal contributor of the GovCon Employment Exchange blog and presents on pay equity and government contractor obligations. To round out her days, Laura enjoys spending time with her family and friends attending sports events, working out, riding her bike, playing pickleball and taking in Colorado’s incomparable sunsets.